Conversational Maxims in Constitutional Court
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Warren Court : Constitutional Decision
The appointment in 1953 of Earl Warren as Chief Justice of the United States marked the beginning of a new era in the development of constitutional law. In the ensuing years changes of vast dimension and historic impact have taken place. Few men are better qualified to assess the significance of the decisions of the Warren Court than Archibald Cox, student of law, teacher of law and, from 1961 ...
متن کاملWhat Readers want to Experience - An Approach to Quantify Conversational Maxims with Preferences for Reading Behaviour
Searching information on web pages is a tedious task for users as web servers provide complete web pages and do not tailor their content to the user’s current information need. This leaves an enormous amount of workload for the user and influences his emotional attitude towards the whole task even if a search engine has filtered pages that are relevant to a user query. In this paper, we propose...
متن کاملThe constitutional miracle on the Rhine: Towards a history of West German constitutionalism and the Federal Constitutional Court
Justin Collings. Democracy’s Guardians: A History of the German Federal Constitutional Court, 1951–2001. Oxford University Press, 2015. Pp. xli, 331. £65. ISBN: 9780198753377. Michaela Hailbronner. Traditions and Transformations: The Rise of German Constitutionalism. Oxford University Press, 2015. Pp. xi, 211. £60. ISBN: 9780198735427. Falk Jaeger (ed.). Transparenz und Würde: Das Bundesverfass...
متن کاملMaxims for Studying Conversations
This paper is divided into three parts. The first outlines problems which the student of conversations faces; of these, some are specific t o conversational material, others general to many kinds of scientific endeavour. The second part attempts to provide a philosophical framework within which these methodological problems can be considered. The third analyses a few existing studies of convers...
متن کاملConvergence of the Protection of Fundamental Rights Between the Spanish Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights
To make ECtHR rulings prevail over final Spanish judgments is a matter for the legislator, not for an extreme or exaggerated interpretation of a law that has not been promulgated for that purpose. Within the context of the doctrine introduced by the Administrative Bench of the TS, the current or subsisting character of the violation of the fundamental right turns out to be a key issue. However,...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Language Intelligence and Culture
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2716-1269,2716-1277
DOI: 10.35719/jlic.v1i01.5